IRCT20200921048792N1 IRCT 2020-10-05 Riphah college of Rehablitation and Allied Health science lahore Effects of mobilization with movement versus mills manipulation technique in chronic lateral epicondylitis Effects of mobilization with movement versus Mills manipulation Technique in Chronic lateral epicondylitis 2019-10-07 anticipated 54 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/51168 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Single blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Treatment, Other design features: Parallel groups, single blinded, single setting, Randomization description: It was a single blinded randomized control trial. in which participant were kept blind. All the participant who came to physiotherapy department was considered and screened for Tennis Elbow.54 patients were allotted in two groups i.e.; group A(MWM) and group B(MILL'S) via lottery method, 27 in each group. Consider the inclusion and exclusion criteria before concerning them in study. Informed consent was taken whether they were willing to participate or not in written form, Blinding description: It was a single blinded study in which participant/ patients were kept blind for treatment technique. 2 different technique were provided to patients. and they were blind about that which technique was given to which patients. N/A Tennis Elbow. Intervention 1: Intervention group: Group A: Mobilization with MovementSubjects with group A received Mobilization with movement technique. The technique involves the application of lateral glide to the proximal forearm laterally while the other hand to glide the distal end of the humerus. The glide was applied and sustained for approximately 5-10 s while the patient performed the pain-free gripping action. Totally, 6 repetitions of the technique were performed during a single treatment session. The period between each repetition was no longer than 60s. This technique was applied in 2 sessions/week for 4 weeks. The fundamental rule that the technique should not provoke pain was followed. Intervention 2: Intervention group: Group B: Mills ManipulationThe therapist had taken up position behind the seated patients. Affected extremity kept in 90-degree abduction with internal rotation enough so that the olecranon was faced up. The therapist stabilized the patient’s wrist in full flexion and pronation with one hand while the other hand was placed over the olecranon. While maintaining the full wrist flexion and pronation, the therapist delivered a high – velocity, low amplitude thrust at the end range of elbow extension. This technique was applied in 2 sessions/week for 4 weeks. Yes - There is a plan to make this available What will be shared: EFFECTS OF MOBILIZATION WITH MOVEMENT VERSUS MILLS MANIPULATION TECHNIQUE IN CHRONIC LATERAL EPICONDYLITIS When: study is completed and become available after its publication To whom: person in academic institute. Patient data will not be shown . Conditions: under the usage with terms in which journal is accessed /processed for publication it could be used in request. Where to obtain: +923207866611 from the University office and Responsible supervisor and from journal we will process in future How to obtain: can be on call or mail It will be only used in confidential way for improving research and benefit of humanity Comments: data can bee provided on request