]>
IRCT20210305050581N1 IRCT 2021-04-15 Riphah international university COMPARISON OF ACTIVE RELEASE TECHNIQUE AND POST ISOMETRIC RELAXATION TECHNIQUE IN NON-SPECIFIC NECK PAIN COMPARISON OF ACTIVE RELEASE TECHNIQUE AND POST ISOMETRIC RELAXATION TECHNIQUE IN NON-SPECIFIC NECK PAIN 2642-03-25 anticipated 54 Pending https://irct.ir/trial/54827 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Treatment, Randomization description: subjects will be randomly distributed (consecutive sampling) to two groups with the use of lottery method of randomization, group 1 patients will get ART, and group 2 will get post isometric relaxation technique, double-blind,, Blinding description: outcome assessor is not blind , the participant was blind, the therapist was blind, statistician was blind. N/A non specific neck pain. Intervention 1: Intervention group1: active release technique, Both groups of patients received cervical isometrics, massage, and a hot pack for 10 minutes. Following that, both groups receive their respective treatments, i.e. Group A is given active release technique, in which the therapist examines and traps the MTrp of the affected muscle by applying pressure with his or her thumb or finger. After that, the patient was asked to actively shift from a reduced to an extended position. The therapist applied constant pressure and tension to the MTrps during this time.. While applying pressure to the ART patient, he or she was sitting or lying on the treatment table. Intervention 2: Intervention group2: post isometric relaxation technique, Group B was given a post-isometric relaxation technique. To perform this technique,The hypertonic muscle is taken to the point where resistance to movement becomes apparent, or to a duration just short of discomfort. A submaximal (10-20%) contraction of the hypertonic muscle is performed away from the limit for 5 to 10 seconds, while the therapist applies resistance in the opposite direction. During this effort, the patient should inhale. Following the isometric contraction, the patient is instructed to relax while exhaling. Following that, a gentle stretch is used to take up the slack until the new barrier is reached. The procedure is repeated beginning with this new barrier. Patients were evaluated prior to the first session and two weeks later using outcome measuring tools such as the NDI and the numeric pain rating scale to assess function and pain.Patients received two treatment sessions per week and were reassessed after the second week of treatment. Subjects did 7–10 repetitions of exercises three times a day, depending on pain intensity. The preliminary evaluation and treatment lasted one hour, and the subsequent treatments lasted 30–45 minutes. The subjects were given a maximum of four treatments over the course of two weeks. Undecided - It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make this available Justification or reason for indecision in sharing IPD is there is no further information
public Dr. Taqdees Manzoor
H # 86/29 St # 30 Sunny View Park
Lahore Pakistan 54810 +92 542 538127 taqdeeskanwal13@gmail.com Riphah international university scientific Dr. Taqdees Manzoor
H # 86/29 St # 30 Sunny View Park
Lahore Pakistan 54810 +92 542 538127 taqdeeskanwal13@gmail.com Riphah international university Pakistan • Age range of 18 to 40 years • Both males and females • Trigger points • Presence of taut bands in skeletal muscles • Limitation of neck movement due to pain • A minimum of two hours a day of computer usage or persistent (bending posture) work routine • Minimum of four weeks of neck pain due to TrPs in the muscles. 18 years 40 years Both • History of a whiplash injury, Cervical spine surgery • Cervical radiculopathy , as diagnosed by their primary care physicians • Cervical spine fracture • Malignancy • Infection • Inflammatory disorder M54.2 Cervicalgia Treatment - Other Treatment - Other Intervention group1: active release technique, Both groups of patients received cervical isometrics, massage, and a hot pack for 10 minutes. Following that, both groups receive their respective treatments, i.e. Group A is given active release technique, in which the therapist examines and traps the MTrp of the affected muscle by applying pressure with his or her thumb or finger. After that, the patient was asked to actively shift from a reduced to an extended position. The therapist applied constant pressure and tension to the MTrps during this time.. While applying pressure to the ART patient, he or she was sitting or lying on the treatment table Intervention group2: post isometric relaxation technique, Group B was given a post-isometric relaxation technique. To perform this technique,The hypertonic muscle is taken to the point where resistance to movement becomes apparent, or to a duration just short of discomfort. A submaximal (10-20%) contraction of the hypertonic muscle is performed away from the limit for 5 to 10 seconds, while the therapist applies resistance in the opposite direction. During this effort, the patient should inhale. Following the isometric contraction, the patient is instructed to relax while exhaling. Following that, a gentle stretch is used to take up the slack until the new barrier is reached. The procedure is repeated beginning with this new barrier. Patients were evaluated prior to the first session and two weeks later using outcome measuring tools such as the NDI and the numeric pain rating scale to assess function and pain.Patients received two treatment sessions per week and were reassessed after the second week of treatment. Subjects did 7–10 repetitions of exercises three times a day, depending on pain intensity. The preliminary evaluation and treatment lasted one hour, and the subsequent treatments lasted 30–45 minutes. The subjects were given a maximum of four treatments over the course of two weeks. Pain. Timepoint: Before treatment and after 2 weeks after treatment. Method of measurement: Numeric pain rating scale(NPRS),. Disability. Timepoint: Before treatment and after 2 weeks after treatment. Method of measurement: Neck disability index (NDI). Riphah international university Approved 2020-03-27 Riphah ethical committee H # 86/29 St # 30 Sunny View Park Lahore Punjab Pakistan