-
Study aim
-
1- Comparison of Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and High Level Laser Therapy (HLLT) on postneedling soreness on patient with chronic neck pain
2- Investigate and comparison of the immediate and long term effects of different kinds of laser (LLLT, HLLT & Placebo) and Dry needle (DN) accompaniment on improvement of chronic neck myafascial pain syndrom
-
Design
-
A randomized, double blind, controlled clinical trial with a parallel group design
-
Settings and conduct
-
The study is being conducted in the Physiotherapy Clinic of the Faculty of Rehabilitation. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are checked and written consent is obtained from all individuals. Patients are randomizing with the Balance Block method. In this study, the assessor and the patients are blind.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Chronic cervical pain (3 months or more) due to myofascial pain syndrome and the presence of a tender point in taut band in the upper trapezius muscle that causes pain in response to compression relies on inclusion criteria. People with any psychologic disorders, a history of stress last week, cervical radiculopathy pain , dizziness, neck surgery, and any type of contraindications of dry needle are excluded from the study.
-
Intervention groups
-
In all groups, the trigger point is first treated with a dry needle. After applying dry needle, the laser is irradiated. In the low-power laser group, a laser with a power of 100 miliWatts/cm2 and an energy of 6 jules, in the group of high-power lasers, a laser with a power of 1 watt/cm2 and a power of 6 jules, and in the control group, the probe is kept off for 1 minute.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Pain pressure threshold in cervical region for assessing soreness (by algometer), pain of palpation for assessing soreness (by VAS scale), neck pain (by VAS scale), cervical range of motion (by goniometer), and disability (by Neck disability index )