-
Study aim
-
Comparison of the effect of distraction technique and valsalva maneuver on the intensity of peripheral venous cannulation pain
-
Design
-
A clinical trial with a control group, with crossover groups, a blind, randomized, randomized, one-way clinical trial
The sample size of 150 people was initially performed as an easy sampling and then randomized in the intraperitoneal venous catheter placement with the Phase II trial.
-
Settings and conduct
-
This is a clinical trial performed on individuals aged 18-60 years old referred to the emergency department of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Esfarayn, Iran. The criteria for entering the study include the need for intravenous venous catheterization.
Angiocate 20 is used for placement, and both angiocate insertion and replacement are performed simultaneously from the same site on both hands. The time for the replacement of the angiocate is also carefully recorded. A single-blind study was conducted that only statistical analysis of the type of intervention in each group was not known.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
People aged 18-60 years old where criteria for entering the study, including the need for intravenous route, are included in the study. Patient with heart disease, hemodialysis, patient with skin and vascular disorders, signs of lowering sensation and movement in the upper limb under peripheral venous vein are not included.
-
Intervention groups
-
In the first and second intervention group, both interventions: Valdasva's deviant technique and maneuver are cross-over and the results are evaluated by an VAS. There was no intervention in the control group and only the pain intensity of the patients angiocate insertion was evaluated.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Determine a convenient and affordable method with easy access and easy learning to reduce the pain of insertion of peripheral venous catheter in patients