-
Study aim
-
Comparison of postoperative chronic pain and quality of life following laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair between three groups of mesh fixation: tacks, Vicryl suture, and non-fixation
-
Design
-
Controlled double-blinded randomised clinical trial in three prallel study groups : tacks (n = 60), Vicryl suture (n = 60), non-fixation (n=60)
-
Settings and conduct
-
The present study will be conducted in Alzahra Treatment and Educational Center, Isfahan, Iran. Within one week from the surgery, each patient will be visited and interviewed. Physical examination and preoperative assessments will be performed, and follow-up visits will be scheduled. Patients will be divided randomly into three study groups by using the table of random numbers. Two highly qualified and experienced surgeons will perform all surgical procedures. The investigators will collect the pre- and post-operation data while both patients and investigators do not have any knowledge of the patient's assigned study group. All of the postoperative complications will be evaluated and confirmed by a blinded surgeon.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria: age over 18, diagnosis of uncomplicated primary uni/bilateral reducible inguinal hernia; eligible for elective laparoscopic hernia repair and general anaesthesia, ASA score of ≤ 3
Exclusion criteria: Complicated, incarcerated, strangulated, or recurrent hernia; following medical conditions: coagulopathy, immunosuppression, current anticoagulation treatment, current opioid or alcohol substance abuse, ongoing long term treatment with steroids and analgesics, ASA score > 3, and BMI ≥ 35
-
Intervention groups
-
Interventions performed in this study included three methods of mesh fixation during inguinal hernia repair: mesh fixation with tacks, mesh fixation with Vicryl suture, non-fixation of the mesh.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Chronic post-herniorrhaphy Inguinal Pain and quality of life