-
Study aim
-
To compare the effects of Kinesio taping versus McConnell taping on function and dynamic postural control in athletes with patellofemoral pain syndrome.
-
Design
-
Parallel groups, single blinded, single setting randomized control trial
-
Settings and conduct
-
Spine Physiotherapy Clinic, Sahiwal.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion Criteria
• Referred athletes with chronic PFPS, Patients diagnosed with chronic PFPS, Subject not received taping before, Subject not receiving any pain killer or medical treatment, Positive Clark’s test , Age: 18 to 40 years, Both gender
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with history of: Ankle and hip pathology, Any other knee abnormality or arthritis, Lower limb fracture, Subject using corticosteroids, Pregnancy, Irritation from taping,Surgery
-
Intervention groups
-
60 athlete patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups, 30 patients in each group. Group A patient were treated with Kinesio taping while Group B patients were treated with McConnell taping technique. Randomization of patients into groups were done by mean of lottery method.
Taking in account an inclusion and exclusion criteria before enrolling them in this study. Informed consent was considered in written about their willingness in the study. Volunteers was provided with the detailed information i.e. both verbal and written regarding the study procedure. Both groups receive conventional therapy, that was TENS, ultrasound and quadriceps exercises
-
Main outcome variables
-
• Functional Activity was assessed by using lower extremity functional scale
• Postural and Dynamic Control measured by star excursion balance test