-
Study aim
-
To compare Mulligan Bent Leg Raise versus Mulligan Traction Straight Leg Raise on pain intensity and hamstring flexibility in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain
-
Design
-
Two-arm, parallel-group, randomized trial with blinded postoperative care and outcome assessment
-
Settings and conduct
-
The study was conducted at Health Care Physiotherapy, Sports, Spine& Rehabilitation Center, Faisalabad, 116 Patients were randomly allocated into groups, Group A received Mulligan Traction Straight Leg Raise (TSLR) while Group B patients received Mulligan Bent Leg Raised Technique (BLR).
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria: Age between 30-50 years, Both gender (male & f0emale, Visual Analog Scale Pain Score 0-7 (Mild Pain 0-4, Moderate Pain 5-7), Non-specific chronic low back pain involving segmental hypomobility and gross limitation of lumber mobility and restriction of SLR, due to discomfort & pain, 15˚ more as compared to the non-involved side. Exclusion criteria:Visual Analog Scale Pain Score 8-10 (Unbearable Pain), Patient already taking treatment for last 6 months, any neurological disease, any physical disability, Pregnancy, history of any surgical procedure involving back or lower extremity.
-
Intervention groups
-
Intervention group A: Traction Straight Leg Raise (TSLR) The Mulligan traction straight leg raise technique was used therapeutically to decrease pain and range of straight leg raise when it was limited due to tightness in hamstrings or dysfunction in the lower back.
Group B: Bent Leg Raised Technique (BLR) The Mulligan bent leg raise method was used for improving the range of straight leg raise in subjects with nonspecific chronic low backache in order to improve hamstring flexibility in individuals with hamstrings tightness.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Pain; range of motion