-
Study aim
-
To find the comparison of thrust manipulation and non-thrust mobilization technique on pain and function in athletes with chronic ankle sprain.
-
Design
-
Randomized Controlled trial: Total 16 participant will be recruited in the study. The subjects will be randomly assigned into two groups A & B with each containing 8 subjects according to their selection by lottery method.
-
Settings and conduct
-
The study will be conducted in Pakistan sports board complex and Model town football club.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria:
1. Athletes with Ankle sprain > 6 weeks; grade 1 or grade 2 ankle sprain, as defined by the West Point Ankle Sprain Grading System Subjects
2. Between age 16-40 years old Athletes both male and female.
3. Positive Ankle Stress Test.
4. Have a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score greater than 3/10 in the last week.
Exclusion criteria:
Patients were excluded if they: Exhibited contraindications to manual therapy as noted
1. Exclusion criteria were red flags noted in the patient’s medical screening questionnaire (eg, tumor, fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, prolonged history of steroid use, or severe vascular disease).
2. Other exclusions included prior surgery to the distal tibia, fibula, ankle joint, or rear foot region (proximal to the base of the metatarsals); fracture; grade III ankle sprain fracture, or other absolute contraindications to manual therapy.
3. Recurrent ankle sprain.
-
Intervention groups
-
Group A, Will receive Thrust Manipulation and baseline treatment.
Group B, Will receive Non-thrust mobilization and baseline treatment.
-
Main outcome variables
-
1. FAAM, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, for primary outcome measure of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in activities of daily living.
2. NPRC, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, for measuring pain.
3. GRoC, Global rating of change, to score improvement in a patient.