-
Study aim
-
To compare the effects of Maitland and Mulligan mobilization for post-surgical mobility complications of distal radius fracture and change the quality of life of participants after the treatment andreduce pain and increase functional mobility
-
Design
-
A single blinded randomized controlled trial having lottery method and simple convenient sampling
-
Settings and conduct
-
Patients were taken from Madinah Teaching Hospital (MTH) Faisalabad, District Headquarter Hospital (DHQ) Faisalabad and Allied Hospital Faisalabad. Group A patients received Maitland mobilization technique and Group B patients received Mulligan (MWM) technique while moist heat was given to both of the groups as a baseline treatment.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Subjects having distal radius fracture and who are gone through the process of open reduction and internal fixation. Moreover, participants whose cast has been removed after two months following the surgery of distal radius fracture. Participants having functional limitation and pain and with an average of about 30 to 60 years are included in the study.
Exclusion criteria includes:• Osteopinea, Malunion of the fracture, Pre- existing inflammatory condition of the joints, Prolong steroid usage, Bony block, Hypermobility, Joint effusion, Haemarthrosis, Sudeck’s dystrophy, Complex regional pain syndrome, Infection, Impaired sensation or circulation, Fracture site other than distal radius
-
Intervention groups
-
Group A (Maitland mobilization group)=Hot pack 15 minutes (baseline treatment) Maitland grade 1 and 2 (first two weeks) Grade 3 and 4 (next two weeks)
Group B (Mulligan mobilization group)=Hot pack 15 minutes (baseline treatment) Mulligan mobilization (medial, lateral , anterior and posterior directions) (four weeks)
-
Main outcome variables
-
Pain, range of motion and functional limitation of wrist