-
Study aim
-
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of Maitland mobilization techniques with and without Kinesio taping in patients with shoulder subacute adhesive capsulitis.
-
Design
-
Twenty four patients with adhesive capsulitis will be divided into two intervention and control groups (Kinesio taping plus Maitland Mobilization, and Maitland Mobilization alone) by simple randomization using a sealed envelope. The study is single blinded and the third phase.
-
Settings and conduct
-
Adhesive capsulitis is a disease characterized by limited active and passive range of motion at the glenohumeral joint, leading to pain and loss of motion. Maitland mobilization is used in the treatment of Adhesive capsulitis in physiotherapy. Kinesio taping is a non-invasive way of treating musculoskeletal injuries which mimics and improves the function of muscle fibers and tendons. This study will be performed on patients referred to the outpatient physiotherapy clinic of the School of Rehabilitation. The study will be single blinded. Patients have no knowledge about the type of the interventions used and the coding to the evaluation forms will be used for blinding.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria: Age between 40-60 years, primary type and sub- acute stage of adhesive capsulitis, restriction of movements in capsular Pattern.
Exclusion criteria: History of shoulder dislocation, fractures and surgery, cervical spine symptoms, neurological condition, hypersensitivity to tape, uncontrolled diabetes, supraspinatus tendon rapture, major cardiopulmonary problems.
-
Intervention groups
-
Both groups will receive supervised exercises. Intervention group will receive the Maitland mobilization and kinesio taping, and the control group, the Maitland mobilization alone.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Pain, range of motion, Muscular torque, Shoulder Discomfort and Disability