-
Study aim
-
the Effectiveness of Tele-rehabilitation Versus face-to-face Physical Therapy on Pain, Physical Function and Quality of Life
-
Design
-
A controlled, parallel-group, single-blind, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial on 60 patients. Random Allocation computer software (version 1.1, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran) is used for randomization.
-
Settings and conduct
-
Physical therapy clinics of the rehabilitation school of AJUMS.The treatment in the intervention group is performed in the form of Tele-rehabilitation and 3 face-to-face counseling sessions for 6 weeks and 3 sessions per week (18 sessions in total). Tele-rehabilitation is done through the vito app software. The treating physiotherapist is the same in both face-to-face treatment and Tele-rehabilitation groups. The evaluating physiotherapist is blinded to the groups.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria: Age between 18 and 45 years, Access to the internet and mobile phone, Anterior knee pain following going up and down stairs, knee flexion and sitting for a long time, knee pain for at least 1 month
Exclusion criteria: knee ligament instability, Knee meniscus pathologies, Patellar tendinopathy or Iliotibial Band tendinopathy, Knee joint effusion, Knee Subluxation or Dislocation or Fracture, Sinding-Larsen-Johansson syndrome, Plica syndrome, Osgood-Schlatter disease, Neuromuscular, rheumatologic or metabolic diseases, Having undergone conservative or surgical treatment of the affected knee less than 6 months previously
-
Intervention groups
-
The intervention group will receive 18 sessions of muscle stretching exercises, muscle strengthening, balance and functional exercises through a remote rehabilitation software. The control group also receives the exercises in the clinic in person.
-
Main outcome variables
-
pain level, Physical function, Quality of life