-
Study aim
-
The objective of this study is to compare the incidence of local infection, dwell time and pain associated with peripheral venous cannulation (PVC) when performed by experts versus general inserters in a tertiary care hospital
-
Design
-
It was a single-center study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Punjab, Pakistan over period of 6 months from April, 2023 to October, 2023. The sample size was 350 individuals. individuals were randomly divided into two groups i.e. expert group and general inserter group using a computer-generated table of random numbers. The study was double blind
-
Settings and conduct
-
The study was carried out at Departments of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Pak Emirates Military Hospital Rwp from Apr 2023-Sept 2023. Participants, care providers, and investigators were blinded
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion Criteria: Patients above the age of 18 years admitted to the medical wards requiring peripheral intravenous access for more than 24 hours were included.
Exclusion Criteria: Patients with peripheral vascular disease, infection of the upper limbs hindering or contraindicating peripheral venous line insertion, patients with a current bloodstream infection, and patients unwilling for the study
-
Intervention groups
-
The Expert Group (intervention group)consisted of 175 patients who received intravenous cannulation by experts i.e. trained medical professionals.
The General Inserters (Comparison Group) group consisted of 175 patients who had intravenous cannulation by general inserters
-
Main outcome variables
-
Infection, dwell time, phlebitis, extravasation, cannulation failure, and pain were studied