-
Study aim
-
To compare treatment outcome in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury undergoing reconstruction surgery with and without distal Kaplan tenodesis
-
Design
-
Two-arm parallel randomized trial, single-blind, on 60 patients, Single center
-
Settings and conduct
-
This single-center trial at Imam Khomeini Hospital (Tehran) included ACL-injury patients aged 18–45y candidates for surgery. Using block randomization (block size=4), patients were assigned to ACL reconstruction with or without Kaplan tenodesis. The surgeon was unblinded; patients, evaluator, and analyst were blinded. Follow-up included physical exams and questionnaires.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria:
Adult patients aged 18 to 45 years, ACL injury that requires surgery.
Exclusion criteria:
Revision surgery of the ACL, Need for bilateral ACL reconstruction, Patients requiring simultaneous repair or reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament and medial or lateral collateral ligament, Patients with symptomatic articular cartilage defects requiring surgery beyond debridement and an intact lateral meniscus, Patients requiring simultaneous osteotomy
-
Intervention groups
-
Intervention group: ACL reconstruction with distal Kaplan tenodesis. After ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft, if internal tibial rotation is observed, distal Kaplan tenodesis is performed. An incision is made in the lateral thigh, a strip is harvested from the Iliotibial Band (ITB), passed over the Lateral Collateral Ligament, and tenodesis is performed at 90 degrees of flexion.
Control group: ACL reconstruction without distal Kaplan tenodesis.
-
Main outcome variables
-
amount of anterior tibial displacement, rotational stability of the knee joint, IKDC Score, Tegner Activity Scale score, Lysholm score, Pain score, need for reoperation