-
Study aim
-
To determine the comparative effect of unilateral spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia on hemodynamics and mortality in hip fracture surgery in the elderly.
-
Design
-
Controlled clinical trial, with parallel groups, phase 3 on 60 patients.
-
Settings and conduct
-
This study will be conducted as a clinical trial on patients over 60 years of age with hip fracture referred to Shahid Rajaee Hospital in Qazvin.
In the intervention group, patients will undergo unilateral spinal anesthesia with hypobaric solution injection including ropivacaine and sufentanil in the subarachnoid space.
In the control group, patients will undergo general anesthesia with standard drugs including propofol, midazolam, sufentanil, atracurium, and isoflurane.
In both groups, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate will be recorded every three minutes before, during, and after the operation.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria: People over 60 years of age referring to Shahid Rajaee Hospital in Qazvin who are undergoing orthopedic surgery due to a hip fracture. Exclusion criteria: multiple trauma (multiple injuries or damage to other organs), increased intracranial pressure (high ICP), emergency surgery or urgent need for anesthesia, spinal injection site infection, coagulation disorders or high INR, history of stroke (CVA) or myocardial infarction (MI) within the last three months, patients in shock.
-
Intervention groups
-
Intervention group: Anesthesia is performed by intra-subarachnoid injection of hypobaric solution containing ropivacaine and sufentanil.
Control group: Patients are placed under general anesthesia with standard drugs including propofol, midazolam, sufentanil, atracurium and isoflurane.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Incidence of severe intraoperative hypotension, intraoperative norepinephrine and ephedrine intake, seven-day postoperative mortality