-
Study aim
-
Radiographic and clinical comparison of 4 methods of filling the buccal gap of immediate implants using extended platelet-rich fibrin(e_PRF), leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin(l_PRF), xenograft, no gap filling
-
Design
-
A randomized clinical trial with a control group and sample concealment, blinding with parallel groups, is being conducted on 68 patients in 4 groups.
-
Settings and conduct
-
Patients for immediate implant placement, if they meet the entry criteria, are randomly assigned to each group, consisting of 17 people. Based on the block randomization method, they are divided into 4 groups:
Immediate implant and no buccal gap filling
Immediate implant and buccal gap filling using xenograft
Immediate implant and buccal gap filling using L-PRF
Immediate implant and buccal gap filling using e-PRF
Blinding is performed during the radiographic data collection stage and the individuals who collect the soft tissue topography scan files and during the statistical data analysis stage.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria
Systemic health and no drug or alcohol addiction
Type 1 socket
Plaque index less than 20%
buccal gap greater than mm2
Exclusion criteria
infection, deep probing depth, and initial implant instability
Need for simultaneous bone grafting
-
Intervention groups
-
The control group does not place any material in the buccal gap.
The Xenograft group, Serabone, is packed in the buccal gap.
The third group, L-PRF, is placed at a setting of 2700 for 12 minutes.The fourth group, e-PRF, is placed in the buccal gap.after blood collection, centrifugation is performed at 700 for 8 minutes, a layer of Poor Plasma Fibrin is placed in the heater to coagulate proteins and mixed with PRF.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Percentage of implant height covered by bone in buccal, measurement of the distance between the external surface of the bone and the implant shoulder