-
Study aim
-
Determining and Comparing thw Effectiveness of Balloon Traction Nephrostomy versus Conventional Nephrostomy Placement in Reducing Hemoglobin Drop in Patients with a Solitary Pelvic Stone Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
-
Design
-
A randomized, non-blinded/open label clinical trial, with the parallel groups, Phase 3 on 130 patients
-
Settings and conduct
-
In this randomized non‑blinded clinical trial, 130 eligible patients presenting to Al‑Zahra and Khorshid Hospitals in Isfahan will be included in the study and randomly divided into two groups. The first group will undergo percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) using the balloon method, and the second group will undergo PCNL using the conventional method. Subsequently, the degree of bleeding reduction in patients will be assessed and compared between the two groups.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria include patients with a solitary pelvic stone undergoing percutaneous nephrostomy, aged 18 years and older. Exclusion criteria include patients with a history of anticoagulant use or uncorrected coagulopathy disorders, a history of renal failure, a history of untreated urinary tract infection, a history of severe pre‑existing anemia, a history of flank surgery, patients with a solitary kidney, a history of renal anomalies, a history of vascular diseases, and patients who required angioembolization during a previous percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
-
Intervention groups
-
Intervention group: At the end of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedure, patients will receive a balloon nephrostomy tube placed into the urinary collecting system.
Control group: At the end of the PCNL procedure, patients will receive a conventional non‑balloon nephrostomy tube, or if a balloon catheter is used, the balloon will not be inflated.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Hydronephrosis