-
Study aim
-
Evaluation of the effect of using Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) in comparison with Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (SIMV) method on lung mechanics (compliance, resistance) in Respiratory Failure patients admitted to intensive care unit
-
Design
-
A randomised clinical trial with a control group, with parallel, unblinded,randomized groups on 64 patients.A computer-generated random number table is used for randomization
-
Settings and conduct
-
In both groups, if the following conditions are present, patient is extubated: Rapid Shallow Breathing Index<105, pulmonary compliance above 40 mL/cmH20, resistance less than 10 cmH20/L/s, SBP more than 90mmHg
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria:Patients with acute type I respiratory failure with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for less than 48 hours are admitted based on P / F Ratio = 150-250 ؛Exclusion criteria:Patients with neuromuscular or diaphragmatic disorder,chest deformity,suspected intracranial hypertention,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or severe asthma,chronic heart failure,chronic renal failure,refractory shock,diagnosed barotrauma,lungs contusion,under 16 years of age and over 85 years,pregnancy,abdominal compartment syndrome
-
Intervention groups
-
In the ASV or intervention group,Minute Volume:100% and pressure set on 30 CmH2O to reach O2Saturation: 88-92% and PEEP = 5 and flow trigger 1-3 l / min.In SIMV group, when the patient reaches PEEP <8 cmH2O and FiO2 <0.4 and 8 PS <cmH2O, they go to spontaneous ventilation mode with the same ventilator towards FiO2: 40%, PEEP = 3cmH2O, PS = 3 cmH2O and trigger: 2.In both age and sex groups, IBW and APACHEII Score at the time of hospitalization and lung mechanics and ventilator and oxygenation settings (P / F Ratio) and ABG indices are recorded on days 1, 2, 3 and 7
-
Main outcome variables
-
Lung mechanics:compliance, resistance