» Advanced search
Only first 10,000 results will be saved in the file.
No item is selected. Use checkboxes to select search results.
Displaying 1-1 of 1 results.
 
{{ selectedCountPage }} items selected on this page, {{ selectedCountPage }} item selected on this page, {{ selectedCountTotal }} item in total {{ selectedCountTotal }} items in total
This study is conducted in 50 subjects diagnosed with locally advanced breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in such tumors is basically used to reduce tumor size. The standard neoadjuvant regimen used, is the combination of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel. End point of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is reaching pathologic complete response (pCR). Generally regardless of the neoadjuvant regimen, pCR, considered as a prognostic factor for response to therapy, has been estimated to be 3-46% in different studies. Since pCR can be relevant to patients’ survival rate, efforts to increase this parameter can be beneficial for the patient. The aim of this study is to evaluate a second line neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the hope of increasing pCR in patients that have not reached a complete clinical response after the standard neoadjuvant regimen. Patient’s clinical status and sonography data are parameters used for evaluating clinical response. According to previous studies and data proving the effectiveness of other agents, carboplatin and gemcitabine with the estimated dose of AUC x 5 and 1g/m2 respectively have been selected as the second line regimen. Two to 3 cycles of second line therapy has been planned. Patients are randomly divided to control and intervention groups. The control group will be receiving the standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the intervention group will be treated with both standard and second line chemotherapy. The pathologist and statistical analyst will be blind towards studied groups of patients.
IRCTID: IRCT2017100136491N1
  1. Comparison of clinical, radiologic and pathologic response rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen containing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with paclitaxel and gemcitabine in locally advanced breast cancer
  2. Assessment of efficacy of weekly paclitaxel as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancers
  3. Efficacy and Complications of Short Course versus Long Course Concurrent Chemo-radiotherapy followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy and Delayed Surgery among Patients with Rectal Cancer.
  4. Evaluation of induction chemotherapy and Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy effect on pathologic complete response in cardia and gastric cancer
  5. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of adding lenalidomide to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for tripple negative breast cancer
  6. Study of efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CAPOX regimen and neoadjuvant chemoradiation in complete pathologic responce in locally advanced rectal cancer
  7. A Phase III, randomized, two armed, parallel, triple-blind, active controlled, equivalency clinical trial to determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety between Pertuzumab® (produced by CinnaGen Co.) plus Trastuzumab, Carboplatin and Docetaxel compared with Perjeta® (Pertuzumab, the reference drug, produced by Roche Company) plus Trastuzumab, Carboplatin and Docetaxel in neoadjuvant treatment of HER 2 positive Breast Cancer patients
  8. Clinical trial to evaluate the resectability rate and tumor response to neoadjuvant chemo radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced proximal gastric cancer and esophagogastric cancer.
  9. FLOT induction chemotherapy before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and resectability and pathologic response in patients with esophagogastric junction and Proximal gastric adenocarcinomas
  10. Comparison of pathological response rates in long-term chemoradiotherapy versus short-term radiotherapy in the total neoadjuvant treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in the context of a randomized clinical trial
Loading...